ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks

Authors

  • Sarin Sok The University of Huddersfield
  • Kimkong Heng Paññāsāstra University of Cambodia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62037/cjer.2023.03.01.06

Keywords:

ChatGPT, benefits, risks, education, research

Abstract

Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that can quickly generate detailed responses to prompts and follow-up questions. This emerging AI tool was launched in November 2022 by an American AI research laboratory, called OpenAI, using large language models. In this article, the benefits and risks related to the use of ChatGPT in education and research are discussed. The article argues that ChatGPT has at least five main benefits, such as creating learning assessment, enhancing pedagogical practice, offering virtual personal tutoring, creating an essay or research article outline, and brainstorming ideas. However, there are risks related to academic integrity issues, unfair learning assessment, inaccurate information, and over-reliance on AI. The article offers a set of recommendations for the effective use of ChatGPT for educational and research purposes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sarin Sok, The University of Huddersfield

Sarin Sok is currently a Chevening scholar pursuing a Master of Education at the University of Huddersfield, the United Kingdom. Prior to this, he completed a Master of Education at the University of Cambodia and worked in the educational and corporate sectors. His research interests center on technology-enhanced learning, learning organization, mentoring and coaching, and educational leadership.

Kimkong Heng, Paññāsāstra University of Cambodia

Kimkong Heng, PhD, is a Lecturer at the Paññāsāstra University of Cambodia. He is also a Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of the Cambodian Education Forum, a National Technical Advisor at the Department of Scientific Research, Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, Cambodia, and a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Cambodia Development Center. His research interests include TESOL, research engagement, academic publishing, and higher education.

References

Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI. The University of Rhode Island. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1547&context=cba_facpubs

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484

Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. EdArXiv Preprints. https://edarxiv.org/mrz8h?trk=public_post_main-feed-card_reshare-text

Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2022). The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: An overview. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2(2), 81-83. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465

Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature, 613(7944), 423-423. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7

Gordijn, B., & Have, H. T. (2023). ChatGPT: Evolution or revolution? Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0

Herft, A. (2023). A teacher's prompt guide to ChatGPT aligned with 'What Works Best' guide. https://www.herfteducator.com/

Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. https://www.edu.sot.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bed/hctl/_my_direct_uploads/ChatGPT_for_Good_.pdf

King, M. R., & ChatGPT. (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8

Kleebayoon, A., & Wiwanitkit, V. (2023). Artificial intelligence, chatbots, plagiarism and basic honesty: Comment. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-023-00759-x

Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354422

Mogali, S. R. (2023). Initial impressions of ChatGPT for anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2261

Mollman, S. (2022, December 10). ChatGPT gained 1 million users in under a week. Here’s why the AI chatbot is primed to disrupt search as we know it. Yahoo Finance. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chatgpt-gained-1-million-followers-224523258.html

OpenAI. (n.d.). GPT-4 is OpenAI’s most advanced system, producing safer and more useful responses. https://openai.com/product/gpt-4

Qadir, J. (2022). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21789434.v1

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Shiri, A. (2023). ChatGPT and academic integrity. Information Matters, 3(2), 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4360052

Sok, S. (2023, February 15). Opinion: Benefits and risks of ChatGPT in education. Cambodianess. https://cambodianess.com/article/opinion-benefits-and-risks-of-chatgpt-in-education

Stokel-Walker, C. (2023). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove. Nature, 613(7945), 620-621.

https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z

Taecharungroj, V. (2023). “What Can ChatGPT Do?” Analyzing early reactions to the innovative AI chatbot on Twitter. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010035

Thurzo, A., Strunga, M., Urban, R., Surovková, J., & Afrashtehfar, K. I. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on dental education: A review and guide for curriculum update. Education Sciences, 13(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020150

van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: Five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7

Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418

Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT for next generation science learning. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4331313

Downloads

Published

13-05-2025

How to Cite

Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2025). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.62037/cjer.2023.03.01.06